<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The CRM Coach &#187; CRM Comparison</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thecrmcoach.com/category/crm-comparison/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thecrmcoach.com</link>
	<description>Practical CRM tips for small business.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 12:55:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Deciding on the Best CRM Software For Your Business</title>
		<link>http://www.thecrmcoach.com/deciding-on-the-best-crm-software-for-your-business/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thecrmcoach.com/deciding-on-the-best-crm-software-for-your-business/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 19:04:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CRM Comparison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CRM Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CRM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Customer Relationship Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Project Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[small business]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecrmcoach.com/deciding-on-the-best-crm-software-for-your-business/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After you&#8217;ve had a couple presentations from CRM software vendors, it’s time for your selection team to convene and compare notes. Save discussions on individual software choices until this meeting; this prevents premature decisions being made without the benefit of full discussion with all view points represented. Evaluate the CRM Software technology, not the Partner Remember: this [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After you&#8217;ve had a couple presentations from CRM software vendors, it’s time for your selection team to convene and compare notes. Save discussions on individual software choices until this meeting; this prevents premature decisions being made without the benefit of full discussion with all view points represented.</p>
<h1>Evaluate the CRM Software technology, not the Partner</h1>
<p>Remember: this meeting is to <strong>evaluate the technology, not the Partner</strong>. Yes, it’s human nature to role the two together and to some extent it’s unavoidable. However, do admonish your Selection Team to focus on the technology.</p>
<p>On your quest to <strong>find the best balance of features and budget</strong>, there are a few critical questions to answer at this meeting:</p>
<ol>
<li>Is there a clear technology winner?</li>
<li>Is the project still feasible? It might be that the proposals all came in way over what you had in mind for a budget.</li>
<li>If there’s not a clear winner, do we feel at least one or two of the CRM software choices may be sufficient? (watch out for inadequate presentations done by Partners).</li>
</ol>
<h1>The Structured Proposal</h1>
<p>It can be very tricky to get a proposal that reveals the true costs of a solution. To help you get a reasonable apple-to-apples comparison, I’ve developed a very simple technique I call “The Structured Proposal”.</p>
<p>(check out the CRM Survival Guide if you are interested in the Structured Proposal)</p>
<h1>Problems With Just Getting a Quote</h1>
<p>You’d think that a sales quote is a sales quote. But with CRM it can be anything but. If you let each presenting Partner give you a quote as they see fit instead of in the Structured Proposal format, you’ll get <strong>a wide range of quotes and have no valid basis for comparison</strong>.</p>
<p>If you were to take the typical quote from a Partner and then have them re-do it using the Structured Proposal format, the new quote would likely be significantly higher. This is because it is designed to force the Partner to put a fair bit of thought and specificity into it, digging up costs that usually are glossed over.</p>
<p>The Structured Proposal is designed to make it easy for you to reasonably compare the costs associated with each technology. (while you won&#8217;t get to a true “apples to apples” comparison, you may get to an “Ida Red apple to Empire apple” comparison.) The format of the Structured Proposal is simple and<br />
yet designed to make it difficult for Partners to “play games” with their quotes.</p>
<h1>The 4 Elements Of The Structured Proposal</h1>
<h2>1. Software Costs</h2>
<p>This is really the key to what makes the Structured Proposal work. Usually, Partners will bury any custom development work into services and often just quote the programming costs, leaving out such things as rework (and you can bank on there being rework on any custom development). With the Structured Proposal, you&#8217;re instructing them to be much more precise:</p>
<ul>
<li>Create a detail line for each custom development piece.</li>
<li>For each piece of custom development, they&#8217;ll have to sign-off that they&#8217;ve considered: Functional<br />
Spec, Detailed Design, Programming, Unit Testing, at least 2 rounds of revisions and delivery.</li>
</ul>
<h2>2. Service Costs</h2>
<p>Each category of service should be clearly delineated. You want this to be broken down into enough detail that you get the sense that they have thought through all the various areas that will be needed.</p>
<h2>3. Disclaimers.</h2>
<p>This is a very effective device. By explicitly asking the Partner (in writing) if there are any areas of concern, the likelihood of you getting an accurate picture goes way up. Often, there will be areas mentioned in here that will warrant more discussion and perhaps more investigation on the Partner&#8217;s part. This can lead to some very useful and effective communications with your potential Partner. Partner&#8217;s that use this area well are taking a big step towards earning your trust and confidence.</p>
<h2>4. Sign-off declaration:</h2>
<p>There&#8217;s nothing like putting a corporate officer&#8217;s signature to a declaration to make sure that what they&#8217;re signing-off on is accurate! “I have read and understand the Business Requirements document and the attached quote represents within +/- 20%”</p>
<h1>Summary</h1>
<p>You need to look at the cost for the whole solution to account for differences in each software’s native strengths and weaknesses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thecrmcoach.com/deciding-on-the-best-crm-software-for-your-business/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Key CRM Concepts You Need To Understand</title>
		<link>http://www.thecrmcoach.com/key-crm-concepts-account-centric-or-contact-centric/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thecrmcoach.com/key-crm-concepts-account-centric-or-contact-centric/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 19:55:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CRM Comparison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CRM Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[account centric]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contact centric]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contact history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CRM Concepts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecrmcoach.com/key-crm-concepts-account-centric-or-contact-centric/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I want to get you up to speed not so much on features, but on broader concepts that you need to keep in mind when selecting CRM technology. Fit With IT It’s a good idea to pick a CRM system that your IT staff are capable of supporting. That said, be careful not to dismiss [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><font face="Courier New">I want to get you up to speed not so much on features, but on broader concepts that you need to keep in mind when selecting CRM technology.</font></p>
<h1>Fit With IT</h1>
<p><font face="Courier New">It’s a good idea to pick a CRM system that your IT staff are capable of supporting. That said, be careful not to dismiss very good choices because your IT staff may not be familiar with current, main stream technologies. Being that you’re a small business, your IT staff should be reasonably<br />
up to speed on main stream small business technologies.</font></p>
<p><font face="Courier New">You need to look at how well the CRM technology fits in with the skills and competencies of your IT staff. For example, if your IT staff is familiar with MS SQL Server (common for small businesses) as a database back-end and the CRM solution is Oracle based (usually used in larger<br />
Enterprises), this could cause some problems. Certainly, your IT staff will not have a comfort level (at first) of working in that new environment for back-ups and database maintenance issues.</font></p>
<h2>Contact vs. Account Centric</h2>
<p><font face="Courier New">There are two basic paradigms for CRM systems: </font></p>
<ol>
<li><font face="Courier New">Contact Centric: In Contact Centric systems, the primary organization is around independent contacts.</font></li>
<li><font face="Courier New">Account Centric: </font><font face="Courier New">In Account Centric systems, there are two levels to the basic organization: a company or account layer to which multiple contacts can be related.</font></li>
</ol>
<h1>Reasons for Compromising on Technology</h1>
<h2>Contact Centric</h2>
<p><font face="Courier New">In a contact centric system, the database is organized around individual contacts. So, if you have dealings with 3 different people all from the same company, you would have 3 different contact records and in each record would be the company name.</font></p>
<p><font face="Courier New">There may be ways to relate different contacts together, but these will be in the “workaround” class. A Contact centric organization makes sense if you are dealing with individuals and you do not need to do such things as look at an organization’s combined history. It is very difficult/clumsy to track company related information separately from contact information. </font></p>
<p><font face="Courier New">For example, if you want to track information about a company (e.g. sic code, # employees, annual budget, etc.) separately from contact related information (e.g. favourite hobby, home phone number, spouse’s name, etc.). there isn’t an easy way to do that:</font></p>
<ul>
<li><font face="Courier New">Under which contact do you store the company information,</font></li>
<li><font face="Courier New">Which contact becomes the primary record,</font></li>
<li><font face="Courier New">Do you store the information under both </font><font face="Courier New">contacts&#8230;which makes updating difficult.</font></li>
<li><font face="Courier New">Do you create a “contact” record to serve as the company record and somehow relate the contacts to it?</font></li>
</ul>
<h2>Account Centric</h2>
<p><font face="Courier New">Account centric CRM systems have a layer above contact, the organization or account, that can tie multiple contacts together. This has the advantage of being able to track company-related information entirely separately from contact-related information. This approach is usually easier to:</font></p>
<ul>
<li><font face="Courier New">See all opportunities for an account/company.</font></li>
<li><font face="Courier New">See combined history.</font></li>
<li><font face="Courier New">Do address updates.</font></li>
<li><font face="Courier New">See the organization and all its contacts in one view.</font></li>
<li><font face="Courier New">Report on company vs. individuals easier.</font></li>
</ul>
<p><font face="Courier New">Unless you are working in an industry where you only need one contact record per account, choose an Account centric CRM system.</font></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thecrmcoach.com/key-crm-concepts-account-centric-or-contact-centric/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Research CRM Software Choices</title>
		<link>http://www.thecrmcoach.com/research-crm-software-choices/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thecrmcoach.com/research-crm-software-choices/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 15:19:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CRM Comparison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CRM Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CRM Strategy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecrmcoach.com/research-crm-software-choices/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The first step in choosing a technology is to research what’s out there—to get familiar with the lay of the CRM land. The goal of this stage is to narrow the field down to 6 technologies that appeal to you. Most of the companies I’ve seen implement CRM have checked out no more than 3 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first step in choosing a technology is to research what’s out there—to get familiar with the lay of the CRM land. The goal of this stage is to narrow the field down to 6 technologies that appeal to you.</p>
<p>Most of the companies I’ve seen implement CRM have checked out no more than 3 companies and only because they are the ones that happened to be top of mind. I’m suggesting going much broader with as many as 12 companies to do the preliminary research phase with. Doing this will:</p>
<ul>
<li>Give you a much better sense of what’s available</li>
<li>Make you a much more educated consumer</li>
<li>Increases the likelihood of selecting the right technology for you</li>
<li>What To Look For</li>
<li>When you’re in the Research Phase, the idea is to get a basic understanding of the variety of technologies available. You will get a good feel for what the choices are and should be able to easily identify 3 to 6 technologies you feel should be looked into more closely.</li>
</ul>
<h1>Popular CRM Packages</h1>
<p>There are literally dozens of CRM packages available. In the next table, I’ve put together a list of 12 popular packages—by no means is this a complete list, but it does represent a good sampling of available technologies:</p>
<h1>Alphabetical List of Some Popular CRM Software Packages</h1>
<h3>Package, Manufacturer, Website</h3>
<p>ACT!,  Sage,  <a target="_blank" href="http://www.act.com">www.act.com</a><br />
 GoldMine, FrontRange, <a target="_blank" href="http://www.frontrange.com">www.frontrange.com</a><br />
 Maximizer, Microsoft, <a target="_blank" href="http://www.microsoft.com/crm">www.microsoft.com/crm</a><br />
 NetSuite, NetSuite, <a target="_blank" href="http://%20www.netsuite.com/">http:// www.netsuite.com</a><br />
 Onyx , Onyx, <a target="_blank" href="http://www.onyx.com">www.onyx.com</a><br />
 Pivotal, Pivotal, <a target="_blank" href="http://www.pivotal.com">www.pivotal.com</a><br />
 Sage CRM (formerly ACCPAC CRM), Sage, <a target="_blank" href="http://www.accpac.com/products/CRM">www.accpac.com/products/CRM</a><br />
 SalesLogix, Sage, <a target="_blank" href="http://www.saleslogix.com">www.saleslogix.com</a><br />
 Salesforce.com, Salesforce.com, <a target="_blank" href="http://www.salesforce.com">www.salesforce.com</a><br />
 SalesNet, SalesNet, <a target="_blank" href="http://www.salesnet.com">www.salesnet.com</a><br />
 Siebel, Siebel, <a target="_blank" href="http://www.siebel.com">www.siebel.com</a></p>
<h1>Don’t Get Drawn In To A Sales Cycle</h1>
<p>At the Research Stage, you don’t want to get bogged down on any one solution. <strong>This means avoiding salespeople and CRM Partners!</strong> Don’t look for or accept the direct help of the manufacturer or a Partner at this point.</p>
<p>If you are contacted, politely and firmly let them know: “Thank you for your call; we’re currently doing broad research. If you’d like to assist at this stage, you can send me any information on your solution that you can.”</p>
<p>If you’re pushed for a meeting, push back saying: “Now is not the right time to meet. We’ll be putting together a short list of companies to present at a later date.” Be sure to stick with the Insider’s Buying Process. Find out more in the <a target="_blank" href="http://http://www.thecrmcoach.com/how-to-crm-project/">CRM Survival Guide.</a></p>
<p><strong>This approach of staying in control</strong> and making it clear that you’re following a process of your own has two purposes:</p>
<ol>
<li>Keeps you from getting bogged down.</li>
<li>(more importantly) Sets the tone with the manufacturer that you’re serious and knowledgeable which <strong>will translate into better treatment and negotiating strength</strong> down the road.</li>
</ol>
<h1>Don’t Install A Trial Version</h1>
<p>It’s amazing how many companies have called me up in the past and have asked me to send them a trial version of the software. Despite my best efforts to explain to them that after they install the software, they’ll look at the screen and say “Now what?”.</p>
<p>Let me be more direct with you than I was able to be with former prospects of mine: <strong>“Trial software that you have not been trained on, that has not been configured for your Business Requirements is useless. It’s a waste of time and I advise you to steer clear!”</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thecrmcoach.com/research-crm-software-choices/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Advantages of Business Requirements For Your CRM Project</title>
		<link>http://www.thecrmcoach.com/business-requirements-predict-crm-project-success/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thecrmcoach.com/business-requirements-predict-crm-project-success/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 15:23:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Requirements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CRM Comparison]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecrmcoach.com/business-requirements-predict-crm-project-success/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I harp on the need to have business requirements a lot, but it&#8217;s worth harping on. Why? Because whether you&#8217;re a medium size company doing a full-blown CRM or a small business doing a Sales Force Automation project, having a good set of Business Requirements is the single best predictor to success. Let&#8217;s look at [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I harp on the need to have business requirements a lot, but it&#8217;s worth harping on. Why? Because whether you&#8217;re a medium size company doing a full-blown CRM or a small business doing a Sales Force Automation project, <strong>having a good set of Business Requirements is the single best predictor to success</strong>.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s look at some of the advantages that make having CRM Business Requirements a predictor to success&#8230;</p>
<h1>Business Requirements Save You Money</h1>
<p> The clarity that comes from working on your business requirements will:</p>
<ul>
<li>Help ensure that you know what to focus on when implementing CRM,</li>
<li>Helps you choose the right CRM or Sales Force Automation software,</li>
<li>Does a lot of footwork that your CRM Partner would otherwise want to charge you for (i.e. Saves you money!)</li>
</ul>
<h1>Business Requirements Naturally Lead You To Choose</h1>
<p>You&#8217;re much more likely to look at several competing products if you have a good set of CRM Business Requirements. Once a company has a clear set of Business Requirements, it becomes very natural to &#8220;shop it around&#8221; and see which CRM or SFA software can satisfy the requirements best. Without Business Requirements many small businesses only look at one or two solutions and buy the one that their instinct tells them is the better (what a mistake!).</p>
<h1>Instead of Following Some Salesperson&#8217;s Sales Process, You&#8217;ll Be In Control</h1>
<p>Sellers of CRM and SFA want to be in on the ground floor of your buying process, gently (or not so gently) steering you to the &#8220;logical conculsion&#8221; that their solution is the best choice. It&#8217;s a far easier argument for the seller when they can act as the trusted advisor<br />
and help the customer figure out what the solution should look like.</p>
<p><strong>Your written Business Requirements document will be (should be!) the first major interface potential CRM Partners will have with your business</strong>. It sets the tone for the rest of the project and your relationship with your chosen CRM Partner. Your business requirements document will send a signal that you&#8217;re in control of the project and will make it less likely to have quot;sales games&#8221; played against<br />
you.</p>
<p><strong>Starting off on the right foot will not just save you significant amounts of money, it will also dramatically increase your chance of success.</strong></p>
<h1>You&#8217;ll Get Much More Value From The Sales Cycle By Having Business Requirements</h1>
<p>Sellers prefer to &#8220;work with&#8221; customers to put together a solution&#8211;work that they can often charge for. Companies with clear Business Requirements for CRM can get prospective CRM Partners to do a lot of foot work at no charge to &#8220;prove&#8221; their solution will satisfy the CRM Business Requirements.</p>
<h1>The Process of Putting Together Business Requirements Means That Users Get Involved</h1>
<p>The process of developing Business Requirements gets users involved and that will help the overall change process and user adoption rate for CRM.</p>
<h1>Better Budgets With Business Requirements</h1>
<p>Better estimate the scope. By investing the time to catalogue your Business Requirements, you will have a very accurate sense of what the CRM system needs to be able to do. This will help you estimate the scope and budget for your project.</p>
<h1>Pick The Best CRM Software</h1>
<p>Use the CRM Business Requirements to choose the best CRM software for your small business. The Business Requirements becomes the single most critical piece in selecting the right technology for your small business. It becomes the measuring stick by which all technologies are measured.</p>
<p>For more ideas on starting your Small Business CRM or Sales Force Automation project on the right foot, download a copy of our FREE &#8220;CRM Street Smarts for the Busy Executive&#8221;.</p>
<p>For a complete brain dump of what to do and what not to do when implementing CRM for your small business, be sure to check out the <a target="_blank" href="http://http://www.thecrmcoach.com/how-to-crm-project/" title="CRM Survival Guide">CRM Survival Guide</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thecrmcoach.com/business-requirements-predict-crm-project-success/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ACT! vs GoldMine: What You Need To Know To Choose The Best One</title>
		<link>http://www.thecrmcoach.com/act_vs_goldmine_crm_comparison/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thecrmcoach.com/act_vs_goldmine_crm_comparison/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 18:21:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Requirements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CRM Comparison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CRM Software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecrmcoach.com/dev/act_vs_goldmine_crm_comparison/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For some reason, one of the most asked questions of me is &#8220;which is better: ACT! or GoldMine?&#8221; Sometimes, they ask about Maximizer or SalesLogix, but ACT! and GoldMine are currently the two main ones I get asked about for software comparisons. I remember when I was a Consultant, selling CRM software, I used to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p align="left"><img src="http://www.thecrmcoach.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/crm_software_comparison1.jpg" alt="CRM Software Comparison which is best?" />For some reason, one of the most asked questions of me is <font color="#ff6600">&#8220;which is better: ACT! or GoldMine?&#8221; </font></p>
<p>Sometimes, they ask about Maximizer or SalesLogix, but ACT! and GoldMine are currently the two main ones I get asked about for software comparisons.</p>
<p>I remember when I was a Consultant, selling CRM software, I used to wait for the head-to-head product comparisons from the CRM manufacturer. Why? Because it&#8217;s what my prospects kept asking for! And I wasn&#8217;t alone…this kind of product matrix or comparison chart was probably the most asked for marketing document from the Reseller community.</p>
<p>But they weren&#8217;t head-to-head comparisons at all. It wasn&#8217;t competitive intelligence. After a while I came to understand that these charts were thinly veiled marketing hype posing as &#8220;competitive intelligence&#8221; and were very biased and, in my opinion, deviously skewed. (A careful reading will reveal that the features or functions have been worded in such a way as to give one CRM package a better rating or score).<span id="more-24"></span></p>
<p>Now when I&#8217;m asked which CRM package is best, I tell people &#8220;You&#8217;re asking the wrong question!&#8221;.</p>
<p>For those of you who don&#8217;t want to listen to my explanation about what the right approach is, don&#8217;t worry. Further down, I have included some specific areas you should examine when evaluating such programs as ACT!, GoldMine and Maximizer. It&#8217;s not a comprehensive list, but should provide a really good start. (In the Insider CRM Success Toolkit, I give over 50 pages of detailed notes on comparing feature sets).</p>
<h2>&#8220;GoldMine versus ACT! Is The Wrong Question!&#8221;</h2>
<p>Usually, but not always, these companies are smaller (one or a few salespeople) that enjoys the entrepreneurial flexibility of &#8220;just do it&#8221;. However, when it comes to implementing a Customer Relationship Management system, it&#8217;s important to pause for a moment and make sure you&#8217;re taking the right approach.</p>
<p>When I see a company using the approach of comparing CRM software feature sets, that&#8217;s a pretty big clue that they&#8217;re headed towards project failure. Companies that &#8220;go looking for a CRM package&#8221; without having an explicit business requirements document and look for the CRM software with the best feature set are headed for project disappointment.</p>
<p>It may sound subtle, but the distinction is critically important to the success of your CRM project. (As you read my explanation, I want you to keep in mind that the failure rate of CRM projects is 70%!)</p>
<h2>It&#8217;s All About The Business Requirement</h2>
<p>Both ACT! and GoldMine have been around for many years, have a large and enthusiastic user base and depending on your business requirements are a great choice. So, how do you really know which one is best for you?</p>
<h3>Let me be clear…</h3>
<p>I&#8217;m not saying that you need to spend a bunch of money on an expensive consultant to do your business requirements or do a detailed needs analysis. In fact, my strong recommendation is that you do this yourself. The payoff goes far beyond just a CRM project!</p>
<h3>Your business requirements document should:</h3>
<ul>
<li>Be a formal document.</li>
<li>Detail &#8220;what you need to be able to do&#8221; with your CRM system.</li>
<li>Deal with your vision for the system for the next 3 to 5 years. So, if you&#8217;re starting with your salespeople now and hope to add customer service in a year, your business requirements should include both departments.</li>
</ul>
<p>With your business requirements in hand, it becomes a much simpler task of looking at editor&#8217;s choice awards, magazine reviews, product recommendations and the like in order to make a decision. Instead of relying on often biased or rushed product reviews that simply repeat what the software makers have told them, you will have your own measuring stick.</p>
<h2>What If Neither ACT! or GoldMine Is Right?</h2>
<p>I would say better than 80% of companies that ask me which Customer Relationship Management system is best are only considering GoldMine or ACT! and have never considered anything else. This is usually because these are the ones they&#8217;ve heard most about and they probably have friends who use one of them. This is a mistake!</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t limit yourself! After you have you business requirements, it&#8217;s time to go look at the field—there are hundreds of CRM and Sales Force Automation (SFA) packages, all with their own particular strengths, weaknesses and specializations.</p>
<p>In The CRM Survival Guide, I show you how to efficiently check out the market and narrow down your choices. You may end up with an entirely different CRM system like SalesLogix, SalesForce.com, NetSuite, MS CRM and so on.</p>
<h2>Look Beyond The &#8220;Back-of-the-Box&#8221; Marketing Hype</h2>
<p>At some point you need to evaluate which CRM system is going to best satisfy your business requirements (you have decided to put together an explicit business requirements document, right?!).</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not going to give you a matrix that compares which system has what features—by now you should know that&#8217;s folly. What I am giving you is a list of features to take a close look at and make sure they do what you need them to. By no means is this a complete list—it&#8217;s just the tip of the ice burg.</p>
<ul>
<li>What kind of database is it? Is it a currently popular one? Are there utilities available for doing things like data import, export and clean-up? If you&#8217;ve got more than 20 or so users and/or a lot of data entry volume, then you probably want to be looking at a SQL based database such as MS SQL.</li>
<li>How easy is it to set-up a new synchronization notebook? What happens if the notebook goes &#8220;out of synch&#8221; with the main database; what kind of refresh or recovery is available?</li>
<li>Speaking of synchronization, what happens if, in between synchronizations, the remote user updates the phone number of a contact and someone at head office has updated the person&#8217;s title? Will one of the changes be lost?</li>
<li>In addition to contact or record level security, what kind of field-level and function-level security is there?</li>
<li>Is it contact centric or account centric?</li>
<li>What types of fields can you have? They all have text fields, but what about text boxes, check boxes?</li>
<li>How many add-ons are available for each? Is it widely supported by the 3rd party development community?</li>
<li>What about a faxing solution? How can you do individual and mass fax blasts?</li>
<li>Can you send personalized HTML Email blasts? How easy is it to do?</li>
<li>What features are there to prevent users from printing out or exporting your customer list and walking away with it?</li>
<li>Is there free support provided? Are there active public users groups where you can see what issues others are having and get answers to your questions?</li>
</ul>
<p>Stop! Ask Yourself &#8220;Am I going to fall into the failure trap that everyone else does or am I going to listen to Scott and do this right?&#8221;</p>
<p>OK, I&#8217;ve said my piece. Thanks for hanging in there…it was important. You should walk away with three very important messages:</p>
<ol>
<li>&#8220;Which is better&#8221; is the wrong question. The right question is: &#8220;Which best satisfies my business requirements?&#8221;</li>
<li>Don&#8217;t go shopping or talk to a salesperson until you have a clear set of business requirements.</li>
<li>Look beyond the &#8220;back-of-the-box&#8221; marketing hype and see for yourself how each system satisfies your business requirements.</li>
</ol>
<p>Discover the step-by-step &#8220;No B.S.&#8221; answers that show you exactly how to implement an ACT! or GoldMine system that your users will welcome, that will let you manage sales better in less time, and will give your company the competitive sales boost it needs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thecrmcoach.com/act_vs_goldmine_crm_comparison/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
